Court rejects request to postpone Texas execution

Claud Mccoid


The Supreme Court docket on Tuesday declined to block the execution of Rick Rhoades, a Texas inmate who was sentenced to dying for the 1991 stabbing death of two brothers through a theft. There had been no general public dissents from the court’s one particular-sentence order. Shortly right after the justices turned down Rhoades’ enchantment, he was executed by deadly injection in Huntsville, Texas.

Rhoades’ attractiveness arose from his initiatives to obtain data from the state to support his declare that prosecutors at his 1992 trial violated the Constitution by dismissing probable jurors based mostly on their race. Just after the Texas courts ruled that they lacked the ability to decide Rhoades’ request for data, Rhoades went to federal courtroom, where by he argued that the point out courts’ rulings violated his constitutional correct to because of approach. But a federal district courtroom concluded that Rhoades’ criticism was barred by a doctrine that prohibits the lower federal courts from examining circumstances that are generally appeals from condition court judgments, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit upheld that ruling.

Rhoades then came to the Supreme Court docket on Monday, asking the justices to place his execution on maintain to give him time to file a petition for critique of the 5th Circuit’s conclusion. Shortly just after 6 p.m. EDT, the justices turned that request down, clearing the way for Rhoades’ execution by deadly injection at the point out jail in Huntsville.

This write-up was initially revealed at Howe on the Court.

The post Courtroom rejects ask for to postpone Texas execution appeared 1st on SCOTUSblog.

Next Post

The morning read for Tuesday, Sept. 28

Share Each and every weekday, we decide on a brief list of news articles or blog posts, commentary, and other noteworthy one-way links linked to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, e-mail us at&#[email protected] Here’s the Tuesday morning examine: The Supreme Court docket&#8217s Electrical power […]