A short while ago, Jon Schwartz wrote a critical evaluation of the diplomacy program that aired on the MasterClass channel (here’s the youtube model). It featured an job interview with Madeline Albright and Condoleezza Rice on American diplomacy. Schwartz’s write-up, Condoleezza Rice and Madeline Albright Conduct a MasterClass on the Banal Horror of U.S. Overseas Policy, points out how even with existing events their presentation of situations frequently did not match described specifics of gatherings. Both of those Albright and Rice existing their roles and currently being able to lie for their country.
If everybody is lying, and diplomacy is lying, then in which is the real truth? Or at least the specifics? Most likely I am just naïve in believing that is critical, but I’ll keep firmly to that perception. Lies and deception retain the public’s voice from obtaining any genuine trustworthiness. They are sorts of control, of silencing, of holding on to electric power that is not theirs to maintain (in a democracy).
Dr. Köchler’s summary of his speech pulls back with each other the issues of a uni-polar empire and the deceptions and misinformation that have introduced us to the crumbling edifice of the “world (dis)order”:
As heritage has amply shown, false, self-serving and exclusivist suggestions of planet order, proclaimed by the “hegemon of the moment” — typically in the program of or immediately after major, geopolitical conflict — are not sustainable. If peace is to prevail (or to be restored), good electric power exceptionalism, or unilateralism, must be changed by a blueprint for a method of relations amongst a multitude of sovereign states that accounts for the interests of all, on the basis of mutuality. This will be the only acceptable “win-earn approach” envisageable below ailments of today’s international world.
More Stories
Understanding Legal System Adaptations to Technology
Global Perspectives on Legal System Reforms
The Role of Constitutional Law in Various Systems