December 2, 2022


Advocacy. Mediation. Success.

Bloomsbury Family Law Briefing: January Teaser

Scenario summaries

Re A (Jurisdiction: Spouse and children Legislation Act 1986) (Software for Amplification) [2021] EWFC 105 (15 December 2021), Poole J – Refusal of preliminary challenge software as to no matter whether the English court could hear an software regarding two little ones every single with moms and dads dwelling in various nations around the world.

Re M (A Boy or girl) [2021] EWHC 3225 (Fam) (1 December 2021), Judd J – Enchantment authorized exactly where the court docket did not take right account of the extent of the vulnerability of the mom applicant below FPR 2010, Pt 3A and PD3AA.

GK v PR [2021] EWFC 106 (14 December 2021), Peel J – Attractiveness permitted wherever the recorder below had not taken right account of FPR 2010, Pt 3A and of GK’s vulnerability, and of appropriate distinctive actions. The decide could not be self-confident that GK was able to give proof in the finest possible way. Judicial comment on more than-extensive skeleton arguments.

Austin v Haynes [2021] EWCA Civ 1919 (15 December 2021) – Payer husband’s charging order attractiveness refused. Charging buy built without the need of discover but wherever a independent application is created for a charging order deliver, an application can be manufactured without the need of discover (FPR 2010, r 40.4(1)).

Griffiths v Tickle & ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1882 (10 December 2021) – A father’s unsuccessful appeal that his identify (the mother’s name was to be posted, but she did not appeal) be published in relationship with kids proceedings.

LS v PS and Q [2021] EWHC 3508 (Fam) (23 December 2021), Roberts J – Software refused for disclosure of with out prejudice correspondence among get-togethers by Q as interveners in parties’ fiscal reduction proceedings, and as funders of W’s monetary reduction application.