A lawful authority who formerly labored as an govt at a all over the world publisher shared in a conversation very last week that his previous firm eliminated a site he was composing on, if not all of the company’s weblogs.
He shared that the company’s weblogs were operate by a communication’s experienced who did not value the significance of preserving authorized journalism and commentary.
1 of the weblog posts penned by the executive was cited by a legislation professor at Tulane College as precedent – or a developing block – on the place on which the professor was producing.
Go to the Tulane regulation professor’s law overview post now and the precedent is long gone. Simply click on the reference and you receive a broken backlink.
The communication’s particular person at the publishing corporation is not by yourself in deleted legal weblogs and authorized weblogs. Occurs all of the time in law firms.
No just one is performing in a ill willed fashion,
Authorized weblogs in legislation firms and other businesses are generally run by conversation and advertising and marketing industry experts, versus librarians and know-how administration industry experts.
The later’s do the job is, in aspect, concentrating on the archival of data based on the realization that expertise builds on top rated of the composing of some others.
By eliminating figured out journals and authorized blog posts, the developing blocks of information and facts, if not legal precedent, are removed.
I comprehend that lawful blogs published by law corporations are published to construct reputations and interactions.
My enterprise, LexBlog, was started on this idea. We even now perform as difficult as at any time to enable lawyers and law companies carry out exact same.
I surprise while if legal librarians and information management gurus should really be brought into legal blogging to make absolutely sure we preserve the entire body of lawful information – generally secondary law – that lawful blogs are developing.