The Colorado Supreme Court affirms Woodbridge II’s “Adverse Use” Distinction

Very last calendar year, I posted with regards to the Colorado Court of Appeals’ determination in Woodbridge II, which concluded that the “adverse use” ingredient for prescriptive easement claims only necessitates the claimant to “show a nonpermissive or otherwise unauthorized use of property that interfered with the owner’s house passions.” Viento Blanco, LLC, 2020 COA 34 (Woodbridge II), ¶ 2. Consequently, Woodbridge II concluded, the claimants acknowledgement or recognition of an owner’s title by yourself is inadequate to defeat…
By: Snell & Wilmer