The New York Times, war crimes and the Nuremberg precedent

Claud Mccoid

This article was originally posted on Twitter.

Yesterday’s New York Times’ editorial, “Document the War Crimes in Ukraine,” draws belated attention to the 1946 Nuremberg Tribunal, which indicted and convicted Nazi leaders. It cites the tribunal’s definition of a war of aggression as an international crime:

“To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

In 2004, at a debate at Trinity College, I cited the Nuremberg trial as the basis in international law for the indictment of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, British Prime Minister Blair and many others as war criminals for having launched a war of aggression against Iraq.

David North speaks at Trinity College in Dublin, Ireland on October 14, 2004

During the last 30 years of repeated US wars of aggression, the Nuremberg precedent has been ignored by the Times. It now invokes the precedent against Putin, demonstrating again that the media’s attitude to international law is determined solely by US foreign policy interests.

Next Post

Quesnel Council Highlights - April 5th mtg

Courtesy of the Town of Quesnel: Delegation – Cariboo Chilcotin Coast Tourism Association Director of Advertising and marketing Redpath, presented Council an overview and context to the CCCTA 2018-2023 Municipal Regional District Tax (MRDT) Method Benefits, the organization’s projection for the future 5 many years.  MRDT is a client tax used […]